ACC Events: India vs Pakistan – Cricket Beyond the Boundary
Cricket and Emotional Charge
Whenever India plays Pakistan, it is never “just cricket.” The emotions run deeper than any other sporting rivalry in the world. For both nations, a cricket match is not limited to 22 players on the field—it involves millions glued to their screens, carrying their national pride in every ball bowled. India’s last India-Pakistan match in Asia Cup 2023, for example, had a record-breaking 2.8 crore concurrent viewers on Disney+ Hotstar, proving how emotionally charged such contests are.
Shadows of Terror and Public Anger
The Pehalgam terror incident only reignited old wounds. India has faced the brunt of terrorism for decades, with most attacks linked back to extremist networks from across the border. The 2001 Parliament attack, the 2008 Mumbai carnage killing over 170, the 2016 Uri attack, and Pulwama in 2019 claiming 40 CRPF lives are just some of the blood-stained chapters. Now, targeting tourists in Pehalgam touched an even more sensitive nerve.
This pattern of violence ensures that every India-Pakistan encounter carries undertones of grief, anger, and revenge—not just competition.
Jingoism or Natural Sentiment?
Critics often dismiss the charged atmosphere as “jingoism.” But in truth, it is a natural reflection of collective memory.
Sports are never isolated from politics or history. They are often described as “bloodless wars.” Nations prepare their teams as seriously as they prepare their armies—because victory on the field is symbolic of supremacy.
The slogan “sports for sports” is a myth when national identity, security, and dignity are tied up with the result.
Historical Rivalries – Not Unique to India
This intensity is not unique to South Asia. The England–Australia Ashes series has, for more than a century, seen fiery exchanges both on and off the field. In 1932–33, the infamous “Bodyline” series turned cricket into outright hostility. Even in modern times, war of words in press conferences has been as sharp as the cricket itself.
If sports are seen as pure entertainment, why did the USA boycott the 1980 Moscow Olympics or the Soviet Union retaliate in 1984 Los Angeles? Why do European football derbies so often end in riots? The answer is simple: sports mirror national rivalries.
The ACC Tournament – More Than Cricket
In the latest ACC tournament, the emotional intensity was visible. Refusals to shake hands, refusals to accept trophies—these weren’t trivial acts. They reflected the underlying hostility. For India, not playing Pakistan would have been spun as “fear.” Hence, BCCI chose to play, balancing both commercial logic and national sentiment.
The result? India beat Pakistan three times in the tournament. That itself sent a clear message. But when it came to receiving the trophy, Team India refused to accept it from the ACC president—representing a hostile nation. Symbolism spoke louder than words.
Politics in Sports – An Old Companion
From the 1969 “Soccer War” between El Salvador and Honduras, to Olympic boycotts, to modern-day bans on Russian athletes—sports and politics have always been intertwined. Expecting cricket between India and Pakistan to be immune from history, bloodshed, and geopolitics is naïve.
Accept and Move On
The fever around the recent events will fade in a few weeks, as it always does. But it is important to acknowledge that for India, every match against Pakistan is not merely about cricket—it is about dignity, justice, and resilience in the face of repeated provocations.
To act blind, preach neutrality, and say “cricket is only cricket” would be unfair to the realities we live with. For patriotic Indians, this rivalry will remain symbolic—a battle without guns, but still a battle.
Weldone Team India!!
No comments:
Post a Comment